Giant low-field magnetocaloric effect in EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds
Jiang Wen-Hao1, Mo Zhao-Jun1, †, Luo Jia-Wei1, Zheng Zhe-Xuan1, Lu Qiu-Jie1, Liu Guo-Dong3, Shen Jun2, Li Lan1, ‡
School of Material Science and Engineering, Institute of Material Physics, Key Laboratory of Display Materials and Photoelectric Devices of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Optoelectronic Materials and Devices of Tianjin, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300191, China
Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
School of Material Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: mzjmzj163@163.com lilan@tjut.edu.cn

Project supported by the Science & Technology Development Fund of Tianjin Education Commission for Higher Education, China (Grant No. 2017KJ247).

Abstract

The magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect (MCE) of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds are investigated. Owing to electronic doping, parts of Ti ions are replaced by Nb ions, the lattice constant increases and a small number of Ti4+ (3d0) ions change into Ti3+ (3d1). It is the ferromagnetism state that is dominant in the derivative balance. The values of the maximum magnetic entropy change () are 10.3 J/kg · K, 9.6 J/kg · K, 13.1 J/kg · K, and 11.9 J/kg · K for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds and the values of refrigeration capacity are 36, 33, 86, and 80 J/kg as magnetic field changes in a range of 0 T–1 T. The EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds with giant reversible MCE are considered as a good candidate for magnetic refrigerant working at low-temperature and low-field.

1. Introduction

Liquid helium temperature zones are widely used in low temperature physics, superconducting technology, aerospace, and so on.[1] Magnetic refrigeration technology is one of the high efficiency refrigeration techniques and can be applied to extreme research environment.[2] Magnetocaloric effect materials are the core of magnetic refrigeration technology. Currently, the rare earth intermetallic compounds are a larger family in a low temperature region, such as DyCo2Si2,[3] ReFe2Si2 (Re = Pr and Nd),[4] ErCoSn,[5] Er4CoCd,[6] Tm4CoCd,[7] Re2CuSi3 (Re = Dy and Ho),[8] HoCoAl,[9] the quaternary compound ReT2B2C (where Re represents a rare earth element and T a transition metal),[10] etc.

Recently, rare earth metal oxides are gradually becoming another important research direction of the low-temperature magnetocaloric materials, such as ReCrO4 (Re = Ho, Gd, Lu),[11] Pr2CoMnO6,[12] Re2BaCuO5 (Re = Dy and Er).[13] Li et al. reported that when the magnetic field changed from 0 T to 5 T, the maximum values of magnetic entropy change () could reach 7.5 J/kg · K and 9.2 J/kg · K for Dy2Cu2O5 and Ho2Cu2O5 respectively.[14] Balli et al. reported the anisotropic magnetocaloric effect in single-crystal HoMn2O5, the value of was 13.1 J/kg · K in the easy axis direction as the change of magnetic field (ΔH) is 0 T–7 T.[15] In 2016, Koushik Dey et al. reported that ReVO4 compounds also exhibited huge value of ΔSM at low temperature. The values of were 41.1 J/kg · K, 7.94 J/kg · K, and 19.7 J/kg · K for GdVO4, HoVO4, and ErVO4 when ΔH = 5 T.[16]

Around the temperature region of liquid helium, the magnetic order arrangement of the Cubic perovskite material EuTiO3 is G-type antiferromagnetic (AFM).[17] In EuTiO3, Ti is tetravalent (3d0) and Eu is divalent with large spin moment (S = 7/2) caused by the stable 4f7 electronic configuration. The single crystal EuTiO3 shows a large reversible magnetocaloric effect, the value of is 42.4 J/kg · K as ΔH = 5 T.[18] The polycrystalline EuTiO3 also shows a large [19] Previous reports indicate that the improvement of ferromagnetism (FM) exchange could effectively increase the −ΔSM around the transition temperature when Δ H = 1 T, such as Eu1 − xBaxTiO3 (11.6 J/kg · K),[20] Eu1 − xSrxTiO3 (10 J/kg · K),[21] Eu1 − xLaxTiO3 (10.8 J/kg · K),[22] and EuTi0.9V0.1O3 (11 J/kg · K).[23] When parts of Ti ions are substituted by Nb ions, the magnetic state changes into FM metallic state.[24,25] In 2016, Roy et al. reported that a large magnetocaloric effect of single crystal EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3 (14.7 J/kg · K) could be obtained when ΔH = 1 T. Roy speculated the Nb4+ (4d1) in the EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3 based on metallic behavior.[26] The introduction of an itinerant electron mediates the Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida (RKKY) interaction between the localized moments of Eu2+ ions and the system and exhibits ferromagnetic effect above a critical value of Nb concentration.[24,25] But, if the Nb ions exhibit Nb5+ (4d0), it is also possible to introduce an itinerant electron occupying an empty orbit of the Ti 3d state, resulting in a decrease in Eu 4f–Ti 3d–Eu 4f hybridization and the suppression of AFM coupling, because the AFM exchange comes from the superexchange of Eu2+ 4f spins via the Ti4+ 3d states.[27] For EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds, the contribution of increasing FM exchange needs to be further confirmed and the magnetocaloric effect needs to be studied systematiclly.

In this study EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds are obtained by introducing Nb5+ ions into EuTiO3. The value of is 13.1 J/kg · K for EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3 when ΔH = 1 T, which is more greatly improved than that for EuTiO3. The improvement of ΔSM is attributed to the increase of FM exchange due to the electron doping and lattice expansion in the EuTiO3.

2. Experimental section

A series of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds are prepared by sol–gel method in this work. Firstly, europium oxide (Eu2O3) and five niobium chlorides (NbCl5) are added to an aqueous solution of nitric acid according to a stoichiometric ratio and stirred until they are completely dissolved. Next, tetrabutyl titanate (Ti(OC4H9)4) is added and stirred for 0.5 h to clarify. Secondly, ethylene glycol (C2H6O2) is added as dispersant and stirred for 0.5 h. Then the configured homogeneous solution is dried at 353 K and thoroughly ground. Finally, the power sample is sintered in a tube furnace at 1373 K for 3 h to obtain the precursor, next the precursor is sintered in mixed gas (8% H2 and 92% Ar) at 1573 K for 5 h to obtain EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) series of samples.

The structures of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds are determined by a Rigaku 2500/PC x-ray diffractometer with a Cu radiation source, and the wavelength was 1.54184 Å. The element valence is confirmed by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi). The isothermal magnetization curves are measured by using a commercial superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer and model MPMS-7 from Quantum Design Inc.

3. Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows XRD diffraction peak for each of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds, indicating that the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) are single-phase crystals and belong to a cubic perovskite structure (space group 221). The refined lattice parameter increases from 3.9055 Å to 3.9273 Å with doping Nb ions increasing as shown in the inset of Fig. 1. It is attributed to the larger size of Nb ions (∼ 0.69 Å), after Ti ions have been replaced by Nb ions.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds. Observed data are denoted by crosses, and calculated profile is continuous line overlying them. Short vertical lines indicate angular positions of Bragg positions, and the green curve is the difference between the experimental data and the calculated data. Illustration shows variation of cell volume.

In order to determine the valence of Nb ion in the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds, figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the XPS spectra of Nb 3d and Ti 2p for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds. There are dual positions for Nb 3d (Nb 3d3/2 and Nb 3d5/2), and Nb 3d5/2 is 206.5–206.9 corresponding to the chemical valence of Nb5+, which is different from the previously reported value of Nb4+.[24] The Ti3+ was observed in the XPS due to the balance of the valence state.

Fig. 2. XPS spectra of Nb 3d and Ti 2p for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds.

Figure 3 shows the zero-field-cooling (ZFC) and the field-cooling (FC) temperature dependence of magnetization for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds under an applied magnetic field of 0.01 T. With the decrease of temperature, EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds experience a change from paramagnetic (PM) state to FM state, which are different from what EuTiO3 compound does. The transition temperature of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compound is determined according to the dM/dT as shown in the inset of Fig. 3. When the temperature is higher than the phase transition temperature, the thermal hysteresis is observed in none of the samples. And a bifurcation is observed below transition temperature, which is probably caused by a domain wall pinning effect. But the bifurcation decreases with the number of Nb ions substituting for Ti ions, which may be attributed to the enhancement of FM coupling. Previous reports explained that Nb doping induced ferromagnetism, which is most likely to result from the ferromagnetic interaction between localized Eu-4f spins, mediated by itinerant electrons introduced by chemical doping.[28] The FM ordering of the localized Eu2+ spin is mediated by the itinerant electrons of the dopant Nb4+ (4d1).[26] However, the Nb ions exhibit Nb5+ as shown in XPS, which maybe introduces electrons into the empty Ti-3d band such as Eu1 − xLaxTiO3 compounds.[22] In EuTiO3 the antiferromagnetic coupling comes from the superexchange interactions with Ti-3d (t2g) empty states.[27] Therefore, the 3d1 of Ti ions maybe suppresses antiferromagnetic coupling and promotes ferromagnetic interaction between 4f spins neighboring Eu2+ ions through RKKY. What is more, Akamatsu et al. reported that the increase of lattice parameters in Eu1 − xBaxTiO3[20] and Eu1 − xSrxTiO3[21] could improve the FM coupling.[27] The ionic radius of Nb5+ is larger than that of Ti4+ which obviously increases the lattice constant as shown by XRD in Fig. 1. In short, there are two factors that could improve FM exchange: electronic doping and lattice expansion.

Fig. 3. Temperature-dependent magnetization M curves of ZFC and FC for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) under magnetic field of 0.01 T, with inserts showing dM/dT versus T curves at low temperature under magnetic field of 0.01 T.

Figure 4 shows the isothermal magnetization curves in a temperature range from 3 K to 28 K under magnetic fields ranging from 0 kOe to 50 kOe (1 Oe = 79.5775 A · m−1). The isothermal magnetization curves of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds are nonlinear when TC < T < 16 K, indicating the existence of short-range FM state in the paramagnetic state. None of the isothermal magnetization curves crosses with other one in a low magnetic field range of 0 kOe–10 kOe at 3 K, 4 K, 5 K, and 6 K as shown in Fig. 5, which also implies that the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds all present the FM state.

Fig. 4. Magnetization isotherms of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds measured in temperature range of 3 K–28 K under applied magnetic fields ranging from 0 kOe to 50 kOe.
Fig. 5. Magnetization isotherms of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds measured in temperature range of 3 K, 4 K, 5 K, 6 K under applied magnetic fields ranging from 0 kOe to 10 kOe.

According to the Maxwell relation , the value of −ΔSM is calculated by the isothermal magnetization curve.[29] Figure 6 shows the relationship between −ΔSM and temperature for each of the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds when ΔH is in a range of 0 T–5 T. The values of are 38.0 J/kg · K, 37.5 J/kg · K, 39.6 J/kg · K, and 34.6 J/kg · K, respectively, for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds at transition temperature when ΔH = 5 T. Although the values of −ΔSM for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds decrease when ΔH = 5 T, the values of −ΔSM are 13.1 J/kg · K and 11.9 J/kg · K, respectively, for EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3 and EuTi0.8Nb0.2O3 when ΔH = 1 T, which are larger than that for EuTiO3 (9.8 J/kg · K). The values of −ΔSM for these compounds are all greater than those for other rare earth metal oxide compounds near the liquid helium temperature, such as R2NiMnO6 (R = Dy, Ho, and Er),[30] GdMnO3,[31] and DyScO3,[32] and so on. The increase of −ΔSM may be attributed to the enhancement of FM exchange due to electronic doping and crystal lattice expansion.

Fig. 6. Temperature-dependent magnetic entropy change under magnetic fields 1 T–5 T for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds.

In practical application, magnetic refrigeration materials need not only a large −ΔSM, but also a wide range of phase change temperature, so that they can ensure better cooling effect in a sufficiently wide operating temperature range. The refrigeration capacity (RC) is another important parameter. It represents the exchange of energy between heat and cold in the process of heat exchange, which is directly related to energy efficiency. The RC is calculated from , where T1 and T2 are the temperatures corresponding to half of the peak for the integration limit. The values of RC and −ΔSM for the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds and EuTiO3 are shown in Table 1 when ΔH = 1 T, 2 T, and 5 T. It could be observed that the RC values of the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds are larger than that of the EuTiO3 compound. Especially under the magnetic field changing from 0 T to 1 T the values of RC are 86 J/kg and 80 J/kg for EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3 and EuTi0.8Nb0.2O3 respectively, which are three times larger than that for the EuTiO3 (27 J/kg). It could be clearly observed that the EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3 and EuTi0.8Nb0.2O3 present FM and larger −ΔSM under a low change of magnetic field. At the same time, the temperature span (the full width at half maximum of the −ΔSM) is expanded, so greatly improving the RC, which is more conducive to practical applications. In summary, the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds are considered as a good candidate for magnetic refrigeration materials in liquid helium temperature regions.

Table 1.

Values of −ΔSM and RC under field change of 1 T, 2 T, and 5 T for EuTiO3, EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds.

.

The second-order phase transition is more suitable for magnetic refrigeration cycles. Based on Banerjee’s[33] criterion, if the Arrott plot has a positive slope, the magnetic transition is a second-order phase transition, while the negative slope or S-type belongs to the first-order phase transition. The Arrott plots of the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds show positive slopes as shown in Fig. 7, indicating the second-order phase transition. The phenomenological universal curve of the −ΔSM has been proposed as another method to distinguish between the second order phase transition and the first order phase transition.[34] The normalize ΔS′(θ) can be folded into a curve under different magnetic fields. The reference temperature Tr1 and Tr2 correspond to the peak of . The temperature axis is rescaled in a different way below and above TC as shown below:

Fig. 7. Arrott plots of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds.

Figure 8 shows a ΔS′(θ) plot of different magnetic fields for the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds. It can be observed that the ΔS′(θ) curves almost overlap, which further prove the second-order phase transitions for EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds.

Fig. 8. θ-dependent ΔS′(T) for typical field changes in EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds.
4. Conclusions

A series of EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds is prepared by the sol–gel method. The magnetic and magnetocaloric effects of compounds are studied. The compounds are of the cubic perovskite structure and the Nb element is confirmed to be pentavalent by XPS. The substitution of Nb5+ ions for Ti4+ ions increases the lattice constant and achieves electronic doping, which leads FM exchange to increase. The values of for the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) compounds are 10.3 J/kg · K, 9.6 J/kg · K, 13.1 J/kg · K, and 11.9 J/kg · K, values of RC are 36 J/kg, 33 J/kg, 86 J/kg, and 80 J/kg when ΔH = 1 T, respectively. In addition, the EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds all experience the second-order phase transitions without hysteresis loss. In summary, EuTi1 − xNbxO3 compounds are considered as one of the most promising magnetic refrigeration materials in the liquid helium temperature zone.

Reference
[1] Benford S M Brown G V 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 2110
[2] Shen B G Sun J R Hu F X Zhang H W Cheng Z H 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 4545
[3] Karmakar S K Giri S Majumdar S 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 043901
[4] Ma Y H Dong X S Qi Y Li L W 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.056
[5] Souza R L Monteiro J C B dos Santos A O Cardoso L P da Silva L M 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 165653 j.jmmm.2019.165653
[6] Guo D Wang Y M Li H D Guan R G Xu H Zhang Y K 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 489 165462
[7] Li L W Huo D X Su K P Pöttgen R 2018 Intermetallics 93 343
[8] Zhang Y K Guo D Yang Y Geng S H Li X Ren Z M Wilde G 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 702 546
[9] Zhang X X Wang F W Wen G H 2011 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 L747
[10] Zheng X Q Shen J Hu F X Sun J R Shen B G 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 217502 in Chinese
[11] Midya A Khan N Bhoi D Mandal P 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 17E114
[12] Bhattia I N Mahatob R N Bhattib I N Ahsan M A H 2019 Physica B 558 59
[13] Li L W Su K P Huo D X 2018 J. Alloys Compd. 735 773
[14] Li L W Wang J Su K P Huo D X Qi Y 2016 J. Alloys Compd. 658 500
[15] Balli M Jandl S Fournier P Gospodinov M M 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 232402
[16] Dey K Indra A Majumdar S Giri S 2017 J. Mater. Chem. 5 1646
[17] Shvartsman V V Borisov P Kleemann W Kamba S Katsufuji T 2010 Phys. Rev. 81 064426
[18] Rubi K Chen R F Wang J S Mahendiran R 2016 Phys. Rev. 93 094422
[19] Mo Z J Shen J Li L Liu Y Tang C C Hu F X Sun J R Shen B G 2015 Mater. Lett. 158 282
[20] Rubi K Kumar P Maheswar Repaka D V Chen R F Wang J S Mahendiran R 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 032407
[21] Mo Z J Sun Q L Wang C H et al. 2016 Ceram. Int. 43 2083
[22] Mo Z J Sun Q L Shen J Yang M et al. 2018 Chin. Phys. 27 017501
[23] Roy S Das M Mandal P 2018 Phys. Rev. Mater. 2 064412
[24] Li L Zhou H D Yan J Q Mandrus D Keppens V 2014 APL Mater. 2 110701
[25] Li L Morris J R Koehler M R Dun Z L Zhou H D Yan J Q Mandrus D Keppens V 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 024109
[26] Roy S Khan N Mandal P 2016 APL Mater. 4 026102
[27] Akamatsu H Kumagai Y Oba F Fujita K Murakami H Tanaka K Tanaka I 2011 Phys. Rev. 83 214421
[28] Katsufuji T Tokura Y 1999 Phys. Rev. 60 R15021
[29] Gschneidner K A Jr Pecharsky V K Pecharsky A O Zimm C B 1999 Mater. Sci. Forum 315�?17 42
[30] Jia Y S Wang Q Qi Y Ling L W 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 726 1132
[31] Oleaga A Salazar A Prabhakaran D Cheng J G Zhou J S 2012 Phys. Rev. 85 184425
[32] Wu Y D Qin Y L Ma X H Li R W Wei Y Y Zi Z F 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 777 673
[33] Banerjee S K 1964 Phys. Lett. 12 16
[34] Chandra S Biswas A Datta S Ghosh B Siruguri V Raychaudhuri A K Phan M H Srikanth H 2012 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24 366004